(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5637) Result of the WG5 straw ballot on draft Corrigendum 4
Fri Jan 8 10:30:22 EST 2016
Here is the final version of N2090. There have been no comments since I
sent N2090-2 out on 26 Dec. The final version is unchanged apart from
the removal of "-2".
John Reid wrote:
> Whitlock, Stan wrote:
>> Hi, John - N2090-1 starts:
>> N2094 asked this question
>> "Is N2088, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for
>> submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 4 for Fortran
>> in one of these ways.
>> "N2094" should be "N2089". The "in one of these ways" should be removed.
> Agreed. Also David pointed out the typo "interpretions". New draft
>> Thanks /Stan
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of John Reid
>> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 6:12 AM
>> To: WG5
>> Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5630) Result of the WG5 straw ballot on
>> draft Corrigendum 4
>> The omission of 8 interpretions that were accepted by J3 at its August
>> meeting from J3 and WG5 processing prior to the start of the WG5 straw
>> ballot on draft Corrigendum 4 renders it void. The 8 interpretions are
>> the subject of a current WG5 straw ballot and J3 ballot (see N2093).
>> The comments made in this ballot should nevertheless be taken into
>> account when preparing a revised draft of Corrigendum 4. I have
>> therefore prepared a draft result document that includes all the
>> comments made on the draft corrigendum and this is attached. Please
>> let me know as soon as possible of any omissions or errors.
>> I request /EDIT to take account of the these comments.
>> Best wishes,
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the J3