(j3.2006) edit for interp F08/0144

Robert Corbett robert.corbett
Mon Jan 4 22:13:46 EST 2016

The edit provided for interp F08/0144 appears to allow child
data transfer statements to be executed within a DO CONCURRENT
construct.  Did the committee intend to allow such usage?

An example would be if a procedure invoked by user-defined
derived-type editing contained a DO CONCURRENT loop that
executed a child data transfer statement on some or all of
its iterations.

User-defined derived-type editing hurts my brain enough
without the added complexity of interactions with

Robert Corbett

More information about the J3 mailing list