(j3.2006) Questions about passed-object dummy argument
Van Snyder
van.snyder
Fri Dec 2 01:17:17 EST 2016
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:11 +0900, Cohen Malcolm wrote:
> he rest of your message I cannot understand as you are ascribing views
> to
> me that I expressed the opposite to in my first message.
I didn't ascribe any views. All I said was that I would like to have
explanations of things that are obvious to Malcolm because he works with
this all day every day.
> Anyway I am done
> discussing technical changes
I still don't know what technical change would result.
More information about the J3
mailing list