(j3.2006) Questions about passed-object dummy argument

Van Snyder van.snyder
Fri Dec 2 01:17:17 EST 2016

On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:11 +0900, Cohen Malcolm wrote:
> he rest of your message I cannot understand as you are ascribing views
> to 
> me that I expressed the opposite to in my first message.

I didn't ascribe any views.  All I said was that I would like to have
explanations of things that are obvious to Malcolm because he works with
this all day every day.

> Anyway I am done 
> discussing technical changes 

I still don't know what technical change would result.

More information about the J3 mailing list