(j3.2006) Parent component of extension of abstract type

[Damian Rouson]

> On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:
> 
> Deferred usually means ?doesn?t exist yet?.   So, I agree that invoking a deferred tbp is a not a good idea. 

I agree with the first sentence above, but not the second one unless I?m missing something.  In the email I just sent in response to Tom?s email, I invoke a deferred binding at line 18.  But I?m guessing you mean it?s not a good idea to invoke a deferred tbp on a polymorphic object whose dynamic type has not been established in some way, in which case I agree.  I establish the dynamic type by source allocation at line 42 in the previous example.

Damian