(j3.2006) Binding label and bind(c) procedure name scopes

[Van Snyder]

If I remember correctly, it was Aleks who asked for this.  I searched
through my entire archive looking for "binding" and "aleks" in the same
paper, and didn't find one that did this.

I remember discussions of it, but it's not in the 2008 work plan
(06-010r3).

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:10 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> When I say evidence, I don't mean noting some wording change, I mean actual 
> evidence.
> 
> If you claim an interp did it, that means Which Interp.  My recollection is that 
> the interp came out the way I wrote earlier, so I very very much doubt it.
> 
> If you claim a technical change did it, I've already given evidence that that is 
> not the case.  Of course maybe we did it and forgot to add the change to the 
> Introduction, in which case finding the meeting paper which made the alleged 
> technical change is the necessary evidence (and the Introduction should be 
> fixed...see below).
> 
> If there was some editorial change that was not intended to change the feature, 
> then whatever the words say we did not intend to make any change!
> 
> I was rather hoping the person who claimed we decided to do this would search 
> and find the meeting paper rather than putting the onus on me to "prove a 
> negative".
> 
> If we did decide to change this, I am 99.99% certain it was not via an interp 
> and therefore should have been mentioned in the Introduction, and therefore an 
> interp *to add it to the Introduction* would be in order!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Bill Long
> Date: ?? 27?5?28? 0:24
> To: fortran standards email list for J3
> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) Binding label and bind(c) procedure name scopes
> 
> In 04-007 (F2003) 16.1 on Scope of global identifiers lists the name of an 
> ?external procedure? as a global identifier, unqualified.
> 
> In 10-007r1 (F2008) 16.1 on Global identifiers lists the name of an "external 
> procedure with no binding label? as a global identifier and 16.2 on Local 
> identifiers lists then names of "external procedures that have binding labels? 
> as class 1 local identifiers.  04-007 does not mention binding labels in 16.2 . 
> This change might have occurred by an interp to F2003, which would explain the 
> lack of mention in the F2008 introduction.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> On May 26, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Malcolm Cohen <malcolm at nag-j.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > Bill Long writes:
> >> I thought we already changed the standard to allow this.
> >
> > Did we?  Do you have any evidence for this?  (I don't offhand see anything 
> > about
> > it in the F2008 Introduction... which does not conclusively mean we did not do
> > it, but...)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -- 
> > ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > J3 mailing list
> > J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> Bill Long 
> longb at cray.com
> Fortran Technical Support  &                                  voice: 
> 651-605-9024
> Bioinformatics Software Development                     fax:  651-605-9142
> Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>