(j3.2006) Binding label and bind(c) procedure name scopes
Wed May 27 21:17:25 EDT 2015
If I remember correctly, it was Aleks who asked for this. I searched
through my entire archive looking for "binding" and "aleks" in the same
paper, and didn't find one that did this.
I remember discussions of it, but it's not in the 2008 work plan
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:10 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> When I say evidence, I don't mean noting some wording change, I mean actual
> If you claim an interp did it, that means Which Interp. My recollection is that
> the interp came out the way I wrote earlier, so I very very much doubt it.
> If you claim a technical change did it, I've already given evidence that that is
> not the case. Of course maybe we did it and forgot to add the change to the
> Introduction, in which case finding the meeting paper which made the alleged
> technical change is the necessary evidence (and the Introduction should be
> fixed...see below).
> If there was some editorial change that was not intended to change the feature,
> then whatever the words say we did not intend to make any change!
> I was rather hoping the person who claimed we decided to do this would search
> and find the meeting paper rather than putting the onus on me to "prove a
> If we did decide to change this, I am 99.99% certain it was not via an interp
> and therefore should have been mentioned in the Introduction, and therefore an
> interp *to add it to the Introduction* would be in order!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Long
> Date: ?? 27?5?28? 0:24
> To: fortran standards email list for J3
> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) Binding label and bind(c) procedure name scopes
> In 04-007 (F2003) 16.1 on Scope of global identifiers lists the name of an
> ?external procedure? as a global identifier, unqualified.
> In 10-007r1 (F2008) 16.1 on Global identifiers lists the name of an "external
> procedure with no binding label? as a global identifier and 16.2 on Local
> identifiers lists then names of "external procedures that have binding labels?
> as class 1 local identifiers. 04-007 does not mention binding labels in 16.2 .
> This change might have occurred by an interp to F2003, which would explain the
> lack of mention in the F2008 introduction.
> On May 26, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Malcolm Cohen <malcolm at nag-j.co.jp> wrote:
> > Bill Long writes:
> >> I thought we already changed the standard to allow this.
> > Did we? Do you have any evidence for this? (I don't offhand see anything
> > about
> > it in the F2008 Introduction... which does not conclusively mean we did not do
> > it, but...)
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
> > _______________________________________________
> > J3 mailing list
> > J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> Bill Long
> longb at cray.com
> Fortran Technical Support & voice:
> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
> Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star.
More information about the J3