(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5472) J3/15-159 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015

[Whitlock, Stan]

                                                        J3/15-159
To:           J3 Members
From:      Stan Whitlock
Subject:   J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015
Date:       2015 March 29

Enclosed in the next letter ballot on Fortran interpretations.

The rules for interpretation handling by which we operate say:

    o   J3 votes on the answer at a J3 meeting; a simple majority
        vote marks the answer as "passed by J3 meeting".

    o   Between J3 meetings the chair of /interp sends a J3 letter
        ballot to J3 to approve interp answers that have been "passed
        by J3 meeting".  The letter ballot runs for 30 days.  An interp
        answer passes by a 2/3rds vote;  a no vote must be accompanied
        by an explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's
        vote to yes.

        J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for
        more study even if the answer passes.

12 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after
J3 meeting #206.  This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed
by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot".

The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No   Number    Title

---  ---  F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type
                                 declaration?
---  ---  F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?
---  ---  F08/0128  Is recursive USE within a submodule permitted?
---  ---  F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type
                                 definition?
---  ---  F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped
                                   images?
---  ---  F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision
                                  intentional?
---  ---  F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an
                                  interface block?
---  ---  F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with
                                     nonallocatable dummy OK?
---  ---  F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement
---  ---  F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy
                                   undefinable?
---  ---  F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and
                                  ASYNCHRONOUS
---  ---  F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with
                                  element size zero

The text of these interpretations is attached.  Each interpretation
starts with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send only the
above text {not this entire mail message} with any comments to

        j3 at j3-fortran.org

by 11:59:59PM, PDT, Friday, 24-Apr-2015, in order to be counted.


Thanks                         /Stan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20150329/344d8a2f/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 15-159 Stan - J3 Fortran interp	LB #33 - due 24-Apr-2015 - m207.txt
Url: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20150329/344d8a2f/attachment-0001.txt