(j3.2006) Assumed type

Van Snyder Van.Snyder
Wed Mar 11 20:08:16 EDT 2015


Did we intend to support C void* function results?  Assumed-type objects
cannot be function results.  Is C_PTR good enough for this purpose?  If
so, why is it not good enough for void* parameters?  I.e., why did we
need TYPE(*)?






More information about the J3 mailing list