(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5418) [ukfortran] RE: J3/14-279: J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #32 revised - due 9-Jan-2015

[N.M. Maclaren]

On Jan 15 2015, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>>
>>F08/0110
>>
>>(1): I agree with the intent, of course.
>>
>>I cannot see that the new wording excludes code like the following:
>>
>>    INTEGER :: n
>>    READ (UNIT = n+1, IOSTAT = n)
>
>The interp does not modify the first sentence of paragraph 5 as previously 
>modified by Corrigendum 2, which remains:
>  "The value of a specifier in an input/output statement shall not depend 
> on the definition or evaluation of any other specifier in the 
> io-control-spec-list or inquire-spec-list in that statement."
>
> (The interp only modifies - essentially by adding to - the second 
> sentence of paragraph 5 as it resulted from Corrigendum 2.)

Oops.  Yes.  I misread the edits.  So that query disappears.

Thanks for the correction.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.