(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5611) Interps straw ballot 10

[TAKATA Masayuki]

Here is my vote.

Yes  No   Number     Title

-Y-  ---  F03/0042  IEEE funny values and Standard real generic intrinsic
                      procedures
-C-  ---  F08/0109  LOCK_TYPE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y-  ---  F08/0145  Can initial-data-target be coindexed?
-C-  ---  F08/0147  Is generic resolution of elemental assignment done
                      at runtime?
-Y-  ---  F08/0148  Pointer subobject in structure constructor in
                      pure procedure

I agree with David's comment on F08/0109 that the new constraint should be numbered as C642a.
I agree with Erik's comments on F08/0109 and F08/0147.

F08/0145:
This is a question, rather than a comment, because time is up.
The edit is:
> [70:3] 4.5.4.6
>
> In the first sentence of C461, insert ", noncoindexed" after
> "nonallocatable" so that the sentence reads:
>
> C461 (R443) The designator shall designate a nonallocatable,
> noncoindexed variable that has the TARGET and SAVE attributes and
> does not have a vector subscript.

Is "a nonallocatable, noncoindexed variable" appropriate as an ISO-style
expression, not "a nonallocatable and noncoindexed variable"?

Regards,

Makki

-- 
Takata, Masayuki: Professor
Edogawa University, 474 Komaki, Nagareyama, Chiba 270-0198 Japan
phone: +81-4-7152-9957(direct)  fax: +81-4-7154-2490(shared)
email: takata at edogawa-u.ac.jp