(j3.2006) yy-000: J3 standing documents on the web site

[Whitlock, Stan]

Some more information about the J3 standing documents on the web site:

Doc #

Document Title

Paper #

Date

Up to date?

001

Membership List

15-001r1

7-Feb-2015

Yes

002

LaTeX Document Class for J3





Ignored

003

Guide for new members



1994

Not on web

004

Journal of Requirements

95-004r1

Oct-1995

Not used

005

Strategic plans for WG5

Was N1976

28-Jun-2013

No: N2070 from m207 dated 7-Aug-2015

006

Defect Report

14-006Ar1

18-Jun-2014

No: 15-006r1 in m207

007

Draft Standard

None



Not listed on web

008

Editorial Enhancements for Future Draft Revisions

12-008

22-Jan-2012

No: can't find one

009

Never used





Not on web

010

J3 Work Plan

15-010

7-Aug-2015

Yes

011

Editor's List of Unresolved Technical Issues

14-011

2-Jun-2014

No: 15-011r1 in m207

012

Emeritus Members of J3



Aug-2014

Yes

013

Guidelines for Submitting J3 Papers

14-013

23-Jan-2014

Yes

014

Cumulative edits for F2008 development



18-Nov-2005

Not on web

015


Completed Fortran 95 Interpretations - Corr 1, 2, 3



25-Oct-2005

Not on web - not needed

016

Fortran 2003 Interpretations for Corrigenda 1 through 5

10-006T1-5r1

15-Jun-2010

Yes - should update to F2008

017

Combined Technical Corrigenda 1 to 5 for Fortran 2003

N1823

5-Apr-2010

Yes - should update to F2008

018

Fortran 2003 Interpretation Update Pages

14-018

16-Jun-2014

Yes: contains F2008 corrigenda 1-3

019

Fortran 2008 Combined Technical Corrigenda 1-3

N2005

3-Feb-2014

Yes - should go to 016

020

Fortran 2008 Combined Interpretations for Corrigenda 1-3

N2006

5-Feb-2014

Yes - should go to 017


Here are things that we could do to clean things up:

Doc #

Document Title

Should point to




001

Membership List

15-001r1 in 206b which it does

002

LaTeX Document Class for J3

Keep link for historical purposes

003

Guide for new members

Keep title but no link for now

004

Journal of Requirements

Keep title but no link for now

005

Strategic plans for WG5

Point to N2070 from m207 dated 7-Aug-15

006

Defect Report

Point to 15-006r1 in m207

007

Draft Standard

Point to 15-007r1 in m207

008

Editorial Enhancements for Future Draft Revisions

Keep title but no link for now

009

Unused document number

List as "Unused document number"

010

J3 Work Plan

Point to 15-010 of 7-Aug-2015 in m207 which it does

011

Editor's List of Unresolved Technical Issues

Point to 15-011r1 in m207

012

Emeritus Members of J3

Keep link for historical purposes

013

Guidelines for Submitting J3 Papers

Point to 14-013 of 23-Jan-2014 in m203 which it does

014

Cumulative edits for F2008 development

Keep title but no link for now

015

Unused document number

List as "Unused document number"

016

Fortran 2003 Interpretations for Corrigenda 1 through 5

Make this the title and link of 019

017

Combined Technical Corrigenda 1 to 5 for Fortran 2003

Make this the title and link of 020

018

Fortran 2003 2008 Interpretation Update Pages

Change the title -the link is ok

019

Fortran 2008 Combined Technical Corrigenda 1-3

List as "Unused document number"

020

Fortran 2008 Combined Interpretations for Corrigenda 1-3

List as "Unused document number"


Comments?  Suggestions?

Thanks                                /Stan


-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Dan Nagle
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:01 AM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Subject: (j3.2006) yy-000



Hi,



I've taken a swing at updating the yy-000 documents.



I'm not quite sure what the goal is.



The 000 lists standing docs at the top of the doc.



When a new standing doc is available, I changed the reference to indicate the new standing doc.



When a new standing doc is not available, I left the old standing doc reference in place.



Is this the idea?



They are, after all, standing docs.

OTOH, some docs haven't been changed, oh, in anything up to a decade or so.  Are they still relevant?  Should they be gone?



Please tell me what you want on the web site.  TIA



--



Cheers!

Dan Nagle


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20150816/e95fcb0f/attachment-0001.html