(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5537) Interp straw ballot

[John Reid]

Dear all,

Here is my straw ballot.

John.
-------------- next part --------------

Yes  No   Number     Title
-Y-  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the
                    VALUE attribute?
-C-  --- F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output
                    statements
-Y-  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing
-Y-  --- F08/0116   Interoperable procedures
-Y-  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coindexed arguments
-C-  --- F08/0118   Subobject of variable in variable definition context
-Y-  --- F08/0119   Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL
-Y-  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier?
-Y-  --- F08/0121   Add to introduction defined operations in specification
                   exprs
-C-  --- F08/0122   Types with coarray components
-Y-  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic
-C-  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent
-Y-  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type
                  declaration?
-C-  --- F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?
-C-  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type
                  definition?
-Y-  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped
                  images?
-Y-  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision
                  intentional?
-Y-  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an
                  interface block?
-Y-  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with
                  nonallocatable dummy OK?
-Y-  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement
-C-  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy
                  undefinable?
-Y-  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and
                  ASYNCHRONOUS
-Y-  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with
                  element size zero
                  
COMMENTS
                  
F08/0110
The edit for [243:6-7 9.12p6] is not quite right. It should be
Replace "depend ... <do-variable>, or on" with "be affected by 
the data transfer, the <io-implied-do> processing, or". 
The full replacement para is OK. 

F08/0118
The label in the statement
1   w%c = 42
is not referenced and is distracting to the reader. It should be
removed. 

F08/0122
There is no verb in the edit for [295:4+]. Add "add paragraph" 
after "p18+,". 

F08/0124
I do not like the new term "potential subobject component". Why is it a
"potential" subobject component? I suppose it might have arrays at more
than one level of component selection, so not be a subobject; but in
this case, it does not have the potential to be a subobject. I suggest
"deepcomponent" instead, to indicate the penetration into portions
of allocatable components. 

F08/0127
The edit instructions are too vague. They should be
"Introduction, bullet item on Programs and procedures, last sentence:"

F08/0129
The reference to the standard should be "10-007r1:52:6+" instead of 
"12-007:6+.

F08/0135
The edit does not allow for the edit in Corrigendum 1. It should be
[295:3, as edited by Corr. 1] 12.5.2.4 Ordinary dummy variables, p18
 Change "If ... vector subscript" to
 "If the procedure is nonelemental, the actual argument is an array 
 section having a vector subscript, and the dummy argument does not 
 have the VALUE attribute".