(j3.2006) J3 standing documents on the web site

[Dan Nagle]

Hi,

Stan, thanks for compiling this.

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 00:14 , Whitlock, Stan <stan.whitlock at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Some of the J3 standing documents on the web site are a mess:

<snip table>

> Here are things that we could do to clean things up:
>  
> ?        Is 004 ?Journal of Requirements? necessary?  We haven?t used this since F95.

Your call.  I don?t have any idea.

> ?        006 and 010 should be updated to m207 papers.

Yes.  I?ll try to get 010 today.  Let me know when 006 is ready.

> ?        Should we try to keep 007 ?Draft Standard: up-to-date and pointed to by the web?
> ?        I think there have been 008s ?Editorial Enhancements for Future Draft Revisions? but I can?t find them.  Should we try to keep it up-to-date?

IIRC, this was a placeholder for wordsmithing fixes during the last days of f08.
(Or was that f03?).  IMO, up to the Editor.

> ?        Should we try to keep 011 ?Editor's List of Unresolved Technical Issues? up-to-date?

Fine by me, it?s up to the Editor if he wants to maintain it.

>  
> Comments?  Suggestions?
>  
> Thanks                                /Stans

--

Cheers!
Dan Nagle