(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5329) J3/14-233 J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #31 - due 6-Oct-2014

Van Snyder Van.Snyder
Mon Sep 8 16:55:36 EDT 2014


On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 07:09 +0000, Whitlock, Stan wrote:

> The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
> 
>  
> 
> Yes  No   Number     Title
> 
>  
> 
> -Y-  ---  F08/0108   ultimate components and coarrays
> 
> -C-  ---  F08/0109   LOCK_TYPE and unlimited polymorphic

"C643" in edit at [127:8-9] ought to be "C642"

> 
> -C-  ---  F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output
>                      statements

Final INQUIRE statement in Q1 needs ")"
Edit instructions "[243:6, 12-15 9.12p6,8]" should be
"[243:6-8, 12-14 9.12p6,8]"


> ---  -N-  F08/0111   Undefinition

In the edit instructions, add "as amended by Technical Corrigendum 1".

The first edit appears to be superceded by the second edit, but the
second edit does not include "the same type with different values of
kind type parameters, or of".  The phrase "the same type with different
values of kind type parameters" is inadequate.  It ought to be "the same
type if corresponding kind type parameters have different values". If
the editorial instructions clearly referred to 16.6.6p1(1) as amended by
TC1, the first edit were deleted, and the first sentence of the second
edit were changed to:

"When a scalar variable becomes defined, all totally associated
variables of different type, or of the same type if corresponding kind
type parameters have different values, become undefined."

my vote would be "Y".

> -Y-  ---  F08/0112   STAT= and ERRMSG= in ALLOCATE and DEALLOCATE
> 
> -Y-  ---  F08/0113   Specifiers in image control statements
> 
> -Y-  ---  F08/0114   Can LOCK_TYPE components have the POINTER attribute?






More information about the J3 mailing list