(j3.2006) class of identifiers of procedure pointers

[Malcolm Cohen]

>Are identifiers that name procedure pointers local identifiers (see 16.3.1)?  I

Yes.

>think they should be class (1) local identifiers, but they do not appear in the
>list of class (1) local identifiers.

That would be a defect then.

Dummy procedure pointers are of course covered already since they are (a special 
case of) dummy procedures.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.