(j3.2006) Suggest addition from interp F08/0071

Malcolm Cohen malcolm
Mon Jan 27 20:28:03 EST 2014


Yes it is out of bounds to consider this, seeing as how the text this is 
attempting to edit no longer exists.  If you check "6.5.3.2.2 Vector subscript" 
in 14-007, you will see that there is no equivalent text to the old [124:4-7]. 
It was, in fact, all deleted by Corrigendum 1.

Cheers,

-----Original Message----- 
From: Van Snyder
Date: ?? 26?1?28? 8:32
To: j3
Subject: (j3.2006) Suggest addition from interp F08/0071

In 12-006Ar1, There was a suggested edit for a future revision:

EDITORIAL (for next revision):

Additional edits are suggested:

[124:4] Change "An" to "Note that an",
        change "shall not be" to "is not permitted to be".
[124:5] After "redefined" insert "(12.5.2.4)".
[124:7] After "file" insert "(C901)".

Is it out of bounds to consider this, with whatever revised wordsmithing
is appropriate?

This was gone from 13-006A.


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star.
________________________________________________________________________

-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo. 




More information about the J3 mailing list