(j3.2006) LinkedIn Question re Why TYPEALIAS Not in Fortran 2003

Craig Dedo craig
Sat Jan 25 19:48:55 EST 2014


Everyone:

            Today in the LinkedIn Fortran Programmers Group, Espen Myklebust posted this
question.

[Begin post]

I came by a pdf with the committee draft of the F03 standard, and in there I see a
TYPEALIAS statement that must have been dropped quite late in the process.

Does anyone with (inside) knowledge about that process care to comment on why it didn't
make it into the final F03 standard?

[End of post]

 

            I have forgotten why TYPEALIAS was dropped late in the process.  Does anyone
remember why this happened?

 

Sincerely,

Craig T. Dedo

17130 W. Burleigh Place

P. O. Box 423                         Mobile Phone:  (414) 412-5869

Brookfield, WI   53008-0423    E-mail:  < <mailto:craig at ctdedo.com> craig at ctdedo.com>

USA

Linked-In:   <http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo> http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20140125/bd517be0/attachment.html 



More information about the J3 mailing list