Thu Jan 23 15:02:19 EST 2014
I thought g0.d was done. The 202 paper paper has
J3/13-309r2 131014 Lionel & Cohe Fortran 2015 proposal for G0.d edit sp
Are there still problems, or something?
On Jan 22, 2014, at 17:15 , Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I've prepared 14-010, the work list for the next revision.
> A PDF is attached.
> If no corrections are brought to my attention before Monday, I shall
> send it to the server.
> It looks like the only work items not finished are US-01 (Allow g0.d
> more generally) and US-14 (ISO/IEC 60559:2010 compatibility).
> Now that we've obsolesced the FORALL statement and construct in favor of
> DO CONCURRENT, we no longer have an equivalent as terse as a FORALL
> statement. As feature creep, could we propose a CONCURRENT statement,
> for consideration at the June WG5 meeting?
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
More information about the J3