(j3.2006) 14-010

Dan Nagle danlnagle
Thu Jan 23 15:02:19 EST 2014


I thought g0.d was done.  The 202 paper paper has

J3/13-309r2  131014    Lionel & Cohe Fortran 2015 proposal for G0.d edit sp
 txt                                 13-244r1

Are there still problems, or something?

On Jan 22, 2014, at 17:15 , Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> I've prepared 14-010, the work list for the next revision.
> A PDF is attached.
> If no corrections are brought to my attention before Monday, I shall
> send it to the server.
> It looks like the only work items not finished are US-01 (Allow g0.d
> more generally) and US-14 (ISO/IEC 60559:2010 compatibility).
> Now that we've obsolesced the FORALL statement and construct in favor of
> DO CONCURRENT, we no longer have an equivalent as terse as a FORALL
> statement.  As feature creep, could we propose a CONCURRENT statement,
> for consideration at the June WG5 meeting?
> <14-010.pdf>_______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3


Dan Nagle

More information about the J3 mailing list