(j3.2006) 14-010

Bill Long longb
Thu Jan 23 11:54:26 EST 2014

On Jan 22, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> Now that we've obsolesced the FORALL statement and construct in favor of
> DO CONCURRENT, we no longer have an equivalent as terse as a FORALL
> statement.  As feature creep, could we propose a CONCURRENT statement,
> for consideration at the June WG5 meeting?

I would not favor proposing such a thing.  I don?t recall ever seeing the statement version of FORALL used in practice.  Adding a similar syntax for DO CONCURRENT would add no useful functionality,  and it seems like a stylistic regression.  The task for F2015 was to remove warts, not add them.


Bill Long                                                                       longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Suport  &                                  voice:  651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development                     fax:  651-605-9142
Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101

More information about the J3 mailing list