(j3.2006) J3/13-361 minutes to meeting #202 14-18-Oct-2014 in Las Vegas

[Lionel, Steve]

For domain registration only, 10 years should have been closer to $100. But
what's done is done. Domain registration fees are rarely refundable.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org
[mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Bill Long
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 4:09 PM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) J3/13-361 minutes to meeting #202 14-18-Oct-2014 in
Las Vegas

The email from Dan said the $375 was for 10 years.

Cheers,
Bill

On Jan 22, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Keith Bierman <khbkhb at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just registered a domain *and* webhosting for 3 years for $130 total
with namecheap.com. Support has been pretty responsive, despite my having
initiated the transaction on a holiday and in the middle of their rollout of
a new code base. They didn't quibble about tossing in command line access.
> 
> For whatever that's worth.
> 
> Keith Bierman
> khbkhb at gmail.com
> kbiermank AIM
> 303 997 2749
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Lionel, Steve <steve.lionel at intel.com>
wrote:
> Possibly that the price was 3X the going rate for a .org domain?
Register.com is using 1995 pricing, similar to Network Solutions.
> 
> Steve (who has maybe a dozen domains registered, none of which are 
> more than $12/year.)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org 
> [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Van Snyder
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:46 PM
> To: fortran standards email list for J3
> Cc: Whitlock, Stan
> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) J3/13-361 minutes to meeting #202 
> 14-18-Oct-2014 in Las Vegas
> 
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:19 +0000, Whitlock, Stan wrote:
> > Attached please find the minutes to J3 meeting #202 14-18-Oct-2014 
> > in Las Vegas.
> 
> What was the nature of the objection to reimbursing Dan $375.00 for paying
the J3 domain registration?  How was it resolved?
> 
> Or should "an objection" at line 104 have been "no objection"?
> 
> > I apologize for the lateness of these minutes.
> >
> >
> >
> > These J3 minutes were reconstructed from notes graciously provided 
> > to me by Malcolm Cohen, Bill Long, and Dan Nagle.  Any errors or 
> > omissions in these minutes are my responsibility alone.  Please let 
> > me know if you find any errors or omissions.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
/Stan
> >
> >
> >
> > PS: Dan - please add this file to the J3 web site folder for m202.
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > J3 mailing list
> > J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

Bill Long
longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Suport  &                                  voice:
651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development                     fax:  651-605-9142
Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6616 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20140122/046eba1a/attachment.bin