(j3.2006) Draft 14-010r1

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 11:57 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> 
> BTW I don't see why the "X" status is omitted, which it is even for items that 
> have syntax and that syntax was agreed (e.g. 319r1).  Even the most trivial 
> syntax e.g. "No new syntax" or "no new syntax, obsolescence only" is agreeing 
> the syntax of the item...

In 04-010, the "X" in the "SXE" column meant there were new syntax rules
or constraints, not that we had agreed there was no new syntax.

I don't object to changing it now.

What's the consensus?