(j3.2006) Work plan

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:56 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
> >It took me a while to find 13-356 using this cryptic reference to it.
> >
> >Should it be in 14-010r1 under the "Specs" column?  It has a bit more
> >meat than 13-227.  I wouldn't yet put "S" in the "SXE" column since that
> >column is "Specs, syntaX, Edits complete," and (as far as I can tell)
> >there was no vote on 13-356 at 202.
> 
> It is not specs, but a preliminary discussion document.  I guess it is good to 
> keep track of it, though as you say "S" in the SXE column is not warranted.

Would the paper number be more appropriate in the "Proposal" column?
The proposal in 13-244r1 is essentially identical to 13-227, and neither
one says much more than "we ought to do something."

> Cheers,