(j3.2006) Why is the Passed-Object Argument Explicit?
Craig Dedo
craig
Wed Feb 5 09:04:18 EST 2014
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org]
> On Behalf Of Malcolm Cohen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 18:27
> To: fortran standards email list for J3
> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) Why is the Passed-Object Argument Explicit?
>
> >Do you know why the Fortran standards committee did not choose to make
> >the ?this? arg implicit? (like most other OO languages)
>
> Yes.
>
<snip 6 highly informative reasons>
>
> There are certainly design decisions in F2003 that I regret, but this is not one of
> them.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
Thank you very much to all who answered Jim Dempsey?s question. All of the answers, especially Malcolm?s, were very good and highly informative. I copied Malcolm?s answer into the discussion thread in the Intel Visual Fortran Developer?s Forum.
Sincerely,
Craig T. Dedo
17130 W. Burleigh Place
P. O. Box 423 Mobile Phone: (414) 412-5869
Brookfield, WI 53008-0423 E-mail: < <mailto:craig at ctdedo.com> craig at ctdedo.com>
USA
Linked-In: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo> http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo
Sincerely,
Craig T. Dedo
17130 W. Burleigh Place
P. O. Box 423 Mobile Phone: (414) 412-5869
Brookfield, WI 53008-0423 E-mail: <craig at ctdedo.com>
USA
Linked-In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20140205/76646312/attachment.html
More information about the J3
mailing list