(j3.2006) Why is the Passed-Object Argument Explicit?

Craig Dedo craig
Wed Feb 5 09:04:18 EST 2014


> -----Original Message-----

> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org]

> On Behalf Of Malcolm Cohen

> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 18:27

> To: fortran standards email list for J3

> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) Why is the Passed-Object Argument Explicit?

> 

> >Do you know why the Fortran standards committee did not choose to make

> >the ?this? arg implicit?  (like most other OO languages)

> 

> Yes.

> 

            <snip 6 highly informative reasons>

 

> 

> There are certainly design decisions in F2003 that I regret, but this is not one of

> them.

> 

> Cheers,

> --

> ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.

 

            Thank you very much to all who answered Jim Dempsey?s question.  All of the answers, especially Malcolm?s, were very good and highly informative.  I copied Malcolm?s answer into the discussion thread in the Intel Visual Fortran Developer?s Forum.

 

Sincerely,

Craig T. Dedo

17130 W. Burleigh Place

P. O. Box 423                         Mobile Phone:  (414) 412-5869

Brookfield, WI   53008-0423    E-mail:  < <mailto:craig at ctdedo.com> craig at ctdedo.com>

USA

Linked-In:   <http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo> http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo

 

Sincerely,

Craig T. Dedo

17130 W. Burleigh Place

P. O. Box 423                         Mobile Phone:  (414) 412-5869

Brookfield, WI   53008-0423    E-mail:  <craig at ctdedo.com>

USA

Linked-In:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20140205/76646312/attachment.html 



More information about the J3 mailing list