(j3.2006) Multiple & on free-form continuation?

Lionel, Steve steve.lionel
Thu Aug 28 11:29:35 EDT 2014

I agree the first case should be an error, but I don't think the words in
the standard say that. This is why I think an interp is needed. Bill's
response supports this by noting Cray and PGI disagree as to which & is the
sentinel. PGI's error message for this case, " Non-comment character after a
'&'", isn't supported by the standard.

I will write a paper for 205, outlining the possible approaches, and we can
discuss it then. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6616 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20140828/280fec45/attachment.bin 

More information about the J3 mailing list