(j3.2006) defining a type with no components

Dan Nagle danlnagle
Thu Apr 17 18:15:41 EDT 2014


On Apr 17, 2014, at 16:03 , Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:

> Is the simple act of including a declaration sufficient to cause
> the result to ?be defined by the function??

Well, 2.3.5 at [35:8-9] says the <<specification-part>> of a procedure
is evaluated when execution involves execution of the procedure.

So yes.


Dan Nagle

More information about the J3 mailing list