(j3.2006) defining a type with no components

Dan Nagle danlnagle
Wed Apr 16 20:14:51 EDT 2014


Hi,

Thanks.

On Apr 16, 2014, at 17:34 , Malcolm Cohen <malcolm at NAG-J.CO.JP> wrote:
> 
> 
> It is apparently correct as is since it is saying something is becoming defined.

Apologies for failure of Mark I eyeball.

--

Cheers!
Dan Nagle









More information about the J3 mailing list