(j3.2006) defining a type with no components

Dan Nagle danlnagle
Wed Apr 16 11:35:40 EDT 2014


Given 10-007r1 and

type :: no_comp
end type no_comp

and then

type( no_comp) :: foo

is foo defined?

Does 10-007r1 say that foo is of zero size?
(If so, I can?t find it.)

If foo be of zero size, then [454:29-30] would apply.
If foo were an array, then [454:23] would apply.


does [454:8-10] need to say ?type and kind??

also, [455:1] (32) seems to be on the wrong list
(it should be on the next list, not this one?)



Dan Nagle

More information about the J3 mailing list