(j3.2006) new path to committee drafts

Lionel, Steve steve.lionel
Thu Apr 3 19:11:47 EDT 2014


Shell access isn't needed but I hope SFTP is used. If you'd like my help, let me know. I run several complex sites. I'd also be willing to host if it came to that. 

Steve

> On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:47 PM, "Dan Nagle" <danlnagle at me.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The issue with volunteering to be webmaster is that
> you won?t have shell access to the server.  So it?s download everything,
> fix, and upload.
> 
> That, and the organization is a grad-student-on-acid style.
> I?ve fixed a few things here and there.
> 
> Also, we?ve avoided cookies on general principles.
> 
>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 15:03 , Lionel, Steve <steve.lionel at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> As I see it, the exposure is a direct link to the document. If it was
>> instead provided only through a form submission, perhaps with a web session
>> cookie required, this would block scanning tools from finding it while still
>> allowing legitimate click access.
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Bill Long
>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:51 PM
>> To: fortran standards email list for J3
>> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) new path to committee drafts
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Dan Nagle <danlnagle at ME.COM> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> To download our working draft,
>>> 
>>> click J3 Members on the left
>>> click Members Only
>>> click Standards Documents
>>> 
>>> There are links to the most recent draft, and to the 007 archive near 
>>> the top of the page.
>> 
>> Does this mean that a document like 14-007r1 will not be visible to someone
>> who is not a "member"?  For example, someone who might attend a WG5 meeting
>> where we are discussing the current working document?  Isn't it the case
>> that a current WD will end up as a "paper for this meeting" folder on a
>> fairly frequent basis, and hence be visible?
>> 
>> On a related note, the left column link for Fortran 2003 says that it is the
>> current standard (page not updated since 2007) and the Fortran 95 link says
>> it is the previous standard.  Obvious updates seem in order.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Bill
>> 
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the indirection, and it's only a hack.
>>> 
>>> If anyone complains, they had to bust
>>> the members only wall, so they likely violated a law or two to get 
>>> there.  I tried to keep them out!
>>> 
>>> TTFN
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Cheers!
>>> Dan Nagle
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> J3 mailing list
>>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>> 
>> Bill Long
>> longb at cray.com
>> Fortran Technical Suport  &                                  voice:
>> 651-605-9024
>> Bioinformatics Software Development                     fax:  651-605-9142
>> Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> --
> 
> Cheers!
> Dan Nagle
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3



More information about the J3 mailing list