(j3.2006) UK10 paper

[David Muxworthy]

On 1 Oct 2013, Dan Nagle wrote:

> This is out-of-order anyway, as it goes beyond the delete common requirement,
> and proposes to delete block data as well.  That needs a straw vote
> in J3 anyway, and likely in WG5, too.

No.  N1975 had:

2.  Add the following outdated features to B.2 (Obsolescent features):
    - The EQUIVALENCE statement.
    - The COMMON statement and BLOCK DATA program unit.

N1982 had that "UK-10 except subitems 2c and 3" was approved but didn't
explicitly mention BLOCK DATA because that obviously has no reason to exist
without common blocks.

David