(j3.2006) UK10 paper
Tue Oct 1 06:36:42 EDT 2013
On 1 Oct 2013, Dan Nagle wrote:
> This is out-of-order anyway, as it goes beyond the delete common requirement,
> and proposes to delete block data as well. That needs a straw vote
> in J3 anyway, and likely in WG5, too.
No. N1975 had:
2. Add the following outdated features to B.2 (Obsolescent features):
- The EQUIVALENCE statement.
- The COMMON statement and BLOCK DATA program unit.
N1982 had that "UK-10 except subitems 2c and 3" was approved but didn't
explicitly mention BLOCK DATA because that obviously has no reason to exist
without common blocks.
More information about the J3