(j3.2006) Question about C845
Bill Long
longb
Tue Mar 5 08:55:39 EST 2013
C845 does not constrain any of the parts of the syntax in R850, so I
would say no. On the other hand, there is some inconsistency in the
standard in this area. Compare C517 and C533, for example. Perhaps a
candidate area for "editorial regularization" in the next revision.
Cheers,
Bill
On 3/4/13 7:00 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
> Shouldn't C845 apply to R850?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
--
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
More information about the J3
mailing list