(j3.2006) Question about C845

Bill Long longb
Tue Mar 5 08:55:39 EST 2013


C845 does not constrain any of the parts of the syntax in R850, so I 
would say no.  On the other hand, there is some inconsistency in the 
standard in this area.  Compare C517 and C533, for example.  Perhaps a 
candidate area for "editorial regularization" in the next revision.

Cheers,
Bill



On 3/4/13 7:00 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
> Shouldn't C845 apply to R850?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101





More information about the J3 mailing list