(j3.2006) exception message on termination

[Van Snyder]

Bill Long wrote:
> Perhaps instead of having the current requirement, we could add a 
> IEEE_PRINT_EXCEPTION_SUMMARY intrinsic subroutine that the user could 
> call if they wanted this sort of output, and disconnect the output from 
> STOP.
>   

A very long time ago (i.e., for f95), a block-structured 
exception-handling mechanism was proposed, but fell onto the 
cutting-room floor.

Absent that, how would a program capture a STOP in, say, the main 
program, and call the IEEE_PRINT_EXCEPTION_SUMMARY subroutine?