(j3.2006) Fortran 2003 question
Robert Corbett
robert.corbett
Wed Jul 31 19:08:23 EDT 2013
On 07/31/13 14:36, Bill Long wrote:
> I don't think the underlying text has changed for a while. 16.6.5, para
> 1 item (12) [page 454] of F2008 seems like old text to me. Argument
> association is a form of association.
That might do it, although it is somewhat indirect. There was a clear statement
in the FORTRAN 77 standard, and there is a clear statement in the Fortran 2008
standard, but the intervening standards do not appear to have such clear statements.
>
>
> [Why any interest in F2003 at this point?]
>
Ian Harvey pointed out on comp.lang.fortran that the answer we gave for F08/0089
contradicts the text of the Fortran 2003 standard. (I sent e-mail about that
last week.) The interpretation deals with the differences between Fortran 2003
and Fortran 2008. While investigating his claims, I found I had several other
questions about the rules concerning argument passing both in Fortran 2003 and
in Fortran 2008. This question was one of them.
Bob Corbett
More information about the J3
mailing list