(j3.2006) Ian Harvey again

[Bill Long]

So, he's proposing a constraint C853a similar to C851 ?  Seems 
reasonable. I think this was just an oversight and we did not intend for 
people to specify multiple logical variables, all of which would be set 
to the acquire_lock status.  Seems like an interp.

Cheers,
Bill


On 2/27/13 7:30 PM, Robert Corbett wrote:
> On c.l.f., Ian Harvey pointed out that the LOCK statement does not have the
> usual prohibition against repeated specifiers.  Implementing LOCK statements
> with more than one ACQUIRED_LOCK= specifier is easily done, but such statements
> might not have been intended to be conforming.
>
> Bob Corbett
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101