(j3.2006) paper 13-228

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 09:44 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> >   In the interp discussion it might be helpful to explain why
> >the example code is not conforming.
> 
> You are right, I will point the reader at 12.5.2.13.

It would also be helpful to mention 12.5.2.13 in the first of the new
paragraphs of the alternative edits, maybe as simply as "(12.5.2.13)"
after "the called procedure".