(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5166) [ukfortran] [ Draft corrigendum 3]

[Malcolm Cohen]

Bill Long writes:
>I would not be opposed to moving most of 5.4 into the obsolescent column.

Perhaps, but noone has proposed it either.  Doing so would not be serving 
the user or vendor communities.

I would dispute that the alternatives are "better" in any meaningful sense.

But since that idea is not going to be proposed for the next revision, I 
will stop there.

Cheers,
-- 
............................Malcolm Cohen, NAG.