(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5133) Vote on revised draft DTS

[Robert Corbett]

My vote is

3) No, for the following reasons.

I am persuaded by the comments of the who voted
earlier that the draft TS is not ready to be forwarded
to SC22.

In additional to those comments, I have an editorial
comment, which by itself would not have caused me to
vote no.

The second sentence of Clause 3 seems to be out-of-place.
The sentence is obviously true, so obviously true that I
wondered why it was worth stating.  I was told that it
was needed to make it clear that the name ISO_FORTRAN_ENV
in Clauses 3.3 and 3.4 referred to ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as
extended by the TS.  Again, I thought that to be obvious,
but if it is worth stating, it should be stated explicitly.
I suggest deleting the second sentence of Clause 3 and
replacing Clauses 3.3 and 3.4 with

3.3
event variable
scalar variable of the type EVENT_TYPE(6.2) from the
intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as extended by this
Technical Specification.

3.4
team variable
scalar variable of the type TEAM_TYPE(5.2) from the
intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as extended by this
Technical Specification.

Robert Corbett