(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5116) Vote on revised draft DTS

[Daniel C Chen]

Please answer the following question "Is N1996 ready for forwarding to
SC22 as the DTS?" in one of these ways.

3) No, for the following reasons:

1. From Van and Reinhold's comments, I think there is indeed an issue with
corank, cobounds and coindex mapping inside a CHANGE TEAM construct. I
think the RECODIMENSION as well as the coassociation proposal should be
further studied and considered.

The following are some minor comments to N1996.
2. [16:] 6.4.Should there be a constraint that is the same as C(604) for
the event variable in an EVENT WAIT statement?
3. [20-22] 7.4.7: SOURCE argument for all the collectives should be
coarray. N1996 only explicitly states it for CO_BROADCAST.
4. [22:] 7.4.9. It states SOURCE shall not be polymorphic. The same wording
should be added for RESULT argument.


Thanks,

Daniel

XL Fortran Development - IBM Toronto Software Lab
Phone: 905-413-3056
Tie: 969-3056
Email: cdchen at ca.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/fortran/xlfortran
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20131206/50fea974/attachment.html