(j3.2006) Question about IMPLICIT

[Craig Dedo]

Van and Everyone Else:

            Good question.  Unless there is a explicit language somewhere else, it appears
that this is an oversight.  It looks like interp material.

 

            It appears to me from the context that the rule for a BLOCK construct should
be the same as for an internal procedure or module procedure.

 

            Van, perhaps you should write up an interp about this issue and circulate it
to the people on this mailing list.

 

Sincerely,

Craig T. Dedo

17130 W. Burleigh Place

P. O. Box 423                         Mobile Phone:  (414) 412-5869

Brookfield, WI   53008-0423    E-mail:  < <mailto:craig at ctdedo.com> craig at ctdedo.com>

USA

Linked-In:   <http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo> http://www.linkedin.com/in/craigdedo

> -----Original Message-----

> From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org]

> On Behalf Of Van Snyder

> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 16:03

> To: j3

> Subject: (j3.2006) Question about IMPLICIT

> 

> 

> [109:16] says

> 

> "..., and the default for an internal or module procedure is the mapping in the

> host scoping unit." (This ought not to be a run-on sentence.)

> 

> What's the default in a BLOCK construct?

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> J3 mailing list

>  <mailto:J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org

>  <http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3>
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20130814/7eace851/attachment.html