(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5023) J3/13-xxx interp letter ballot #29 after m201 - due 9-Aug-2013

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 01:43 -0700, Robert Corbett wrote:
> F08/0095 C
> 
> The edits are fine as far as they go.  However, the intrinsic
> functions ALLOCATED and ASSOCIATED present problems similar to
> those of PRESENT.  Those problems should also be addressed.

After admittedly only brief consideration, I am inclined to agree with
Bob.

Does this need a different interp, or should we withdraw 0095 and start
over?

Van