(j3.2006) Materials for 199

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 16:25 -0500, Bill Long wrote:
> 
> On 9/24/12 3:15 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:

> > As larger item - and thus probably out of scope for the Fortran next
> > revision, one could consider to follow the trend of C11 and C++11 and
> > allow some shared-memory parallelization. For instance something

> We do have DO CONCURRENT. Vendors are permitted to translate a loop like 
> that for threaded parallel execution.

I have proposed two mechanisms for parallel execution.  The one in
06-187 can be simulated by embedding a SELECT CASE construct within a DO
CONCURRENT construct, but looks nicer and is more obvious.  The one in
subclause 18 of 97-114r2 was less structured.