(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4801) [ukfortran] Fourth WG5 ballot on interpretations

[Van Snyder]

On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:55 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> Bill Long writes, concerning F08/0048:
>   "Does the interp open the door to a whole room full of "clever
>    programming" opportunities? For example, you can pass a different
>    element on each image."
> Yes, that is precisely why I voted against this interp at every
> previous opportunity.  I think it is a bad idea to provide such a
> confusing feature with so few redeeming qualities.

I need to be enlightened about the problem in F08/0048.

How is passing x(3) on one image, and x(4) on another image, by sequence
association, different from passing x(3:10) on the first image, and
x(4:11) on the second one?