(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4791) RE: Processing interps ballots

[Whitlock, Stan]

John - Yes, we can adopt this process as of WG5 interp ballot 4.  Thanks			/Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Bill Long
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:57 AM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4790) Processing interps ballots



On 9/19/12 10:21 AM, John Reid wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have been corresponding privately with Malcolm re the ballot process 
> for interps. We propose that in future
>
> I assemble the ballot results as soon as I can after the ballot end, 
> but with results only those that are obvious. I will mark the rest with "?"
> and Convenor+/INTERP (rather than Convenor alone) will decide, and be 
> expected to do this quite rapidly, normally within a week.
>
> Is this OK with everyone? I propose to use this for ballot 4, which 
> ends on 28 September.

Yes.  I'd almost forgotten that there is another WG5 ballot, in addition to the J3 ballot, still outstanding.

Cheers,
Bill


>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3