(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4778) Fourth WG5 ballot on interpretations

[David Muxworthy]

Herewith my vote.

Yes  No Number     Title

-C-  ---  F08/0043   Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
                     object
-Y-  ---  F08/0048   Sequence association for coarrays
-C-  ---  F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface
-C-  ---  F08/0055   G editing for reals
-Y-  ---  F08/0056   Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE=
-C-  ---  F08/0057   Interoperability with empty types
-Y-  ---  F08/0058   ENTRY point RESULT variable
-Y-  ---  F08/0059   Auto-targetting requirements
-Y-  ---  F08/0060   Procedure pointer assignment with an EXTERNAL target
-Y-  ---  F08/0061   Description of the CONTIGUOUS attribute misworded?
-Y-  ---  F08/0062   Mixing default initialization with DATA
                     initialization
-Y-  ---  F08/0063   G editing to a narrow output field
-Y-  ---  F08/0064   STATUS of GET_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLE
-Y-  ---  F08/0065   Should certain procedures in intrinsic modules be
                     pure?
-Y-  ---  F08/0066   Are certain expressions with pointer initialization
                     constant?
-Y-  ---  F08/0067   Passing arrays of extended type objects
-Y-  ---  F08/0068   Pointer association and extended type arrays
-Y-  ---  F08/0069   Which part of an effective argument becomes
                     undefined?
-Y-  ---  F08/0070   Finalization of INTENT(OUT) arguments
-Y-  ---  F08/0072   Final subroutines with corank
-Y-  ---  F08/0073   Polymorphic auto-targetting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for comment on F08/0043
Why not remove C1229 now?  It takes only three small edits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for comment on F08/0054
In the first edit shift 'only' four words to the right?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for comment on F08/0055
Is it preferred style to use 'd==0' in narrative English in the edits (twice), rather than d=0?  d is not a variable (although it could be represented by a character variable).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for comment on F08/0057
It would be more in accordance with previous practice to number the new constraint C1504a.  [Corrigendum 1 uses both upper and lower case suffices for new constraints.  Presumably lower case is preferred.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

David