(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4775) Preliminary result of vote on N1929

[Van Snyder]

On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:07 +0100, John Reid wrote:
> Here is the preliminary result of the ballot on N1929. I think there
> is little 
> doubt that the ballot has failed.
> 
> I have changed Van's vote to No and removed the first sentence of his
> comments, which was
>      Replace "must" by "shall" throughout.
> Is this OK, Van?

"Throughout" was perhaps too strong, as Malcolm pointed out.  But "must"
isn't an ISO word, at least not in almost all of the contexts used in
the Vulnerabilities report annex.

> On the assumption that this is OK, I have also removed the last two
> paragraphs of Malcolm's comments because they address the sentence
> that has been removed. 
> Is this OK, Malcolm?

I would keep them both, unless Malcolm crafts a statement that doesn't
require the presence of my objection in order to make sense.