(j3.2006) J3/12-nnn J3 interpretations letter ballot #26 after meeting 198
N.M. Maclaren
nmm1
Thu Sep 13 05:44:39 EDT 2012
This is obviously not a vote, just a comment from a WG5 member.
F08/0075
F08/0076
[ This is more of an aside ]
I think that the decisions to allow arbitrary expressions in both
locations should be reconsidered in the next revision. I would favour
deprecating any expression other than a designator or function
reference. There is precedent in the handling of assumed-length
function results.
F08/0078
I think that the answer is confusing. I would add to the discussion
something like:
On the other hand, the processor is not required to deliver any
particular sign of zero in expressions like -(A-A).
I think that is what is meant - at least, I hope so. Some
clarification would be useful in any case.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
More information about the J3
mailing list