(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4752) Fourth WG5 ballot on interpretations

[John Reid]

WG5,

Here is

N1934 WG5 letter ballot 4 on Fortran 2008 interpretations.

I have set the deadline as 0900 UK time on Friday, 28 September 2012.

Best wishes,

John.

-------------- next part --------------
                                             ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1934

          WG5 letter ballot 4 on Fortran 2008 interpretations
                      John Reid, 2 September 2012

This is the fourth WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 
2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot.  

The rules we operate on say:
--- ---
4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked
   "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor.
   The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote
   must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to
   change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot
   become "WG5 approved".

   J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more
   study even if the answer passes.

5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by
   taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the
   format required by ISO.  A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the
   corrigendum to SC22.

The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No Number     Title

---  ---  F08/0043   Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
                      object
---  ---  F08/0048   Sequence association for coarrays
---  ---  F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface
---  ---  F08/0055   G editing for reals
---  ---  F08/0056   Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE=
---  ---  F08/0057   Interoperability with empty types
---  ---  F08/0058   ENTRY point RESULT variable
---  ---  F08/0059   Auto-targetting requirements
---  ---  F08/0060   Procedure pointer assignment with an EXTERNAL target
---  ---  F08/0061   Description of the CONTIGUOUS attribute misworded?
---  ---  F08/0062   Mixing default initialization with DATA
                      initialization
---  ---  F08/0063   G editing to a narrow output field
---  ---  F08/0064   STATUS of GET_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLE
---  ---  F08/0065   Should certain procedures in intrinsic modules be
                      pure?
---  ---  F08/0066   Are certain expressions with pointer initialization
                      constant?
---  ---  F08/0067   Passing arrays of extended type objects
---  ---  F08/0068   Pointer association and extended type arrays
---  ---  F08/0069   Which part of an effective argument becomes
                      undefined?
---  ---  F08/0070   Finalization of INTENT(OUT) arguments
---  ---  F08/0072   Final subroutines with corank
---  ---  F08/0073   Polymorphic auto-targetting

The text of these interpretations is in N1932.  Each interpretation starts 
there with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

        sc22wg5 at open-std.org

by 0900 UK time on Friday, 28 September 2012, in order to be counted.

Thanks,

John.