(j3.2006) One of the proposals in 12-195 that didn't get out ofsubgroup

[Malcolm Cohen]

On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 10:00 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> As far as I am concerned this is a bad idea and should remain in the circular
> filing cabinet.
>
> If the user wants a type-bound procedure pointer assignment, there is 
> absolutely
> nothing stopping him from writing one.  Just do it.

Van Snyder replied:
>I think this assumes the procedure is public.

No it does not.

I struggle to understand what can possibly make you think that.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.