(j3.2006) One of the proposals in 12-195 that didn't get out ofsubgroup
Wed Oct 31 21:11:37 EDT 2012
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 10:00 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> As far as I am concerned this is a bad idea and should remain in the circular
> filing cabinet.
> If the user wants a type-bound procedure pointer assignment, there is absolutely
> nothing stopping him from writing one. Just do it.
I think this assumes the procedure is public.
> Virtually zero "code bloat"
> (and no code bloat at all in the places where it is used), and he doesn't have
> to wait 10 years for compilers to support a new feature.
More information about the J3