(j3.2006) (j3-members.2006) February meeting schedule

[Van Snyder]

Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have we agreed to the 11-15 February dates?  I'm working on the web site.
>   

I plan to ask Valerie for a contract for 11-15 February.  John Reid has 
a conflict for 18-22 February, while Damian has a conflict for 11-15 
February.  Since we have a tie, and the 11-15 February date was 
announced at first, and it's the traditional week with the second Monday 
of the month, 11-15 seems the right week to use.

I'm sick at home today.  Hopefully, I'll get back to work tomorrow.  
I'll ask Valerie for the contracts, ask Stormi for the URL for 
reservations, and prepare the meeting notice.

Van

> On Oct 25, 2012, at 14:50 , Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On 10/24/12 6:47 PM, Dan Nagle wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Personally, I'm good with either week.  But let's decide soon.
>>>
>>> I feel a slight bend towards the first week, since that date was published,
>>> even if we have made changes previously.
>>>
>>> After reading Damian's most recent post, I'll vote (slightly)
>>> for the 11-15 dates.
>>>       
>> My vote as well.  Allowing for John to attend would provide him a better 
>> picture going into the June WG5 meeting.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>     
>>> On Oct 24, 2012, at 12:44 , Damian Rouson <damian at rouson.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> It appears John Reid won't be able to make it the week I requested.  I certainly don't want the committee to exclude anyone else because of my request.  Regardless of what is the final decision, I very much appreciate that everyone was willing to consider the change.
>>>>
>>>> Damian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:06 -0500, Bill Long wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On 10/23/12 10:02 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> We don't have contracts yet for February or October 2013.  I've been
>>>>>> waiting to ask Valerie until I see whether we change the meeting dates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Like Van, I put arrangements on hold until there is a resolution.  I've
>>>>> checked and there are still decent seats available on flights for both
>>>>> weeks. I don't have a conflict for the next week.  However, the seats
>>>>> are going, so I'd like to know the final dates within the next few days.
>>>>>           
>>>> Unless somebody announces a conflict for the week of 18-22 February,
>>>> that is, the week that Damian is able to attend, by Friday of this week,
>>>> I'll request that week when I ask Valerie to develop contracts.  For
>>>> now, at least, I'll stick with the week of 14-18 October.  We have time
>>>> to change that if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> If somebody has a conflict for the week of 18-22 February, I'll ask
>>>> Valerie to develop a contract for the week of 11-15 February, since that
>>>> was our originally-agreed date.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> Van
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 11:04 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Bill Long write:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> The dates for meeting 200 have already been published at least twice, in
>>>>>>>> the meeting 197 and 198 minutes,
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> That is true but not very important.  We have in fact changed our meeting dates
>>>>>>> once before (that was a joint meeting with WG5).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The meeting dates are, I believe, technically only fixed in stone after the
>>>>>>> meeting notice has gone out... though we certainly don't want to make a habit of
>>>>>>> varying it without good reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One might opine that since there are only 8 of us, 1 of us not being able to
>>>>>>> make it is a good reason to consider changing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> We make the meeting dates long in advance so that we know to not
>>>>> schedule other things at those times.  One could argue that this is the
>>>>> one exceptional case for Damian since he was not in that mode of
>>>>> planning when he scheduled the conflicting activity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> J3 mailing list
>>>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>>>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> J3 mailing list
>>>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>>>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>>>         
>> -- 
>> Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
>> Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
>> Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
>> Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>     
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20121029/6d4c0fc0/attachment.html