(j3.2006) (j3-members.2006) February meeting schedule

[Bill Long]

On 10/24/12 6:47 PM, Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personally, I'm good with either week.  But let's decide soon.
>
> I feel a slight bend towards the first week, since that date was published,
> even if we have made changes previously.
>
> After reading Damian's most recent post, I'll vote (slightly)
> for the 11-15 dates.

My vote as well.  Allowing for John to attend would provide him a better 
picture going into the June WG5 meeting.

Cheers,
Bill


>
> On Oct 24, 2012, at 12:44 , Damian Rouson <damian at rouson.net> wrote:
>
>> It appears John Reid won't be able to make it the week I requested.  I certainly don't want the committee to exclude anyone else because of my request.  Regardless of what is the final decision, I very much appreciate that everyone was willing to consider the change.
>>
>> Damian
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:06 -0500, Bill Long wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/23/12 10:02 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
>>>> We don't have contracts yet for February or October 2013.  I've been
>>>> waiting to ask Valerie until I see whether we change the meeting dates.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Like Van, I put arrangements on hold until there is a resolution.  I've
>>> checked and there are still decent seats available on flights for both
>>> weeks. I don't have a conflict for the next week.  However, the seats
>>> are going, so I'd like to know the final dates within the next few days.
>>
>> Unless somebody announces a conflict for the week of 18-22 February,
>> that is, the week that Damian is able to attend, by Friday of this week,
>> I'll request that week when I ask Valerie to develop contracts.  For
>> now, at least, I'll stick with the week of 14-18 October.  We have time
>> to change that if necessary.
>>
>> If somebody has a conflict for the week of 18-22 February, I'll ask
>> Valerie to develop a contract for the week of 11-15 February, since that
>> was our originally-agreed date.
>>
>>>> Van
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 11:04 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>>>>> Bill Long write:
>>>>>> The dates for meeting 200 have already been published at least twice, in
>>>>>> the meeting 197 and 198 minutes,
>>>>>
>>>>> That is true but not very important.  We have in fact changed our meeting dates
>>>>> once before (that was a joint meeting with WG5).
>>>>>
>>>>> The meeting dates are, I believe, technically only fixed in stone after the
>>>>> meeting notice has gone out... though we certainly don't want to make a habit of
>>>>> varying it without good reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> One might opine that since there are only 8 of us, 1 of us not being able to
>>>>> make it is a good reason to consider changing.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> We make the meeting dates long in advance so that we know to not
>>> schedule other things at those times.  One could argue that this is the
>>> one exceptional case for Damian since he was not in that mode of
>>> planning when he scheduled the conflicting activity.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bill
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101