(j3.2006) (j3-members.2006) February meeting schedule

[Dan Nagle]

Hi,

Personally, I'm good with either week.  But let's decide soon.

I feel a slight bend towards the first week, since that date was published,
even if we have made changes previously.

After reading Damian's most recent post, I'll vote (slightly)
for the 11-15 dates.

On Oct 24, 2012, at 12:44 , Damian Rouson <damian at rouson.net> wrote:

> It appears John Reid won't be able to make it the week I requested.  I certainly don't want the committee to exclude anyone else because of my request.  Regardless of what is the final decision, I very much appreciate that everyone was willing to consider the change.
> 
> Damian
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:06 -0500, Bill Long wrote:
> >
> > On 10/23/12 10:02 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
> > > We don't have contracts yet for February or October 2013.  I've been
> > > waiting to ask Valerie until I see whether we change the meeting dates.
> > >
> >
> > Like Van, I put arrangements on hold until there is a resolution.  I've
> > checked and there are still decent seats available on flights for both
> > weeks. I don't have a conflict for the next week.  However, the seats
> > are going, so I'd like to know the final dates within the next few days.
> 
> Unless somebody announces a conflict for the week of 18-22 February,
> that is, the week that Damian is able to attend, by Friday of this week,
> I'll request that week when I ask Valerie to develop contracts.  For
> now, at least, I'll stick with the week of 14-18 October.  We have time
> to change that if necessary.
> 
> If somebody has a conflict for the week of 18-22 February, I'll ask
> Valerie to develop a contract for the week of 11-15 February, since that
> was our originally-agreed date.
> 
> > > Van
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 11:04 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> > >> Bill Long write:
> > >>> The dates for meeting 200 have already been published at least twice, in
> > >>> the meeting 197 and 198 minutes,
> > >>
> > >> That is true but not very important.  We have in fact changed our meeting dates
> > >> once before (that was a joint meeting with WG5).
> > >>
> > >> The meeting dates are, I believe, technically only fixed in stone after the
> > >> meeting notice has gone out... though we certainly don't want to make a habit of
> > >> varying it without good reason.
> > >>
> > >> One might opine that since there are only 8 of us, 1 of us not being able to
> > >> make it is a good reason to consider changing.
> > >>
> >
> > We make the meeting dates long in advance so that we know to not
> > schedule other things at those times.  One could argue that this is the
> > one exceptional case for Damian since he was not in that mode of
> > planning when he scheduled the conflicting activity.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bill
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-- 
Cheers!

Dan Nagle